Skip to main content

Site Group .vs. Cross Site Group

Site group and cross site group are a great way to manage SharePoint site permission. Cross site group, compared to site group or Active Directory group, has more benefits.

  1. Cross site group is created in site collection level. Its working scope is the site collection, that is top level site and all its sub sites. While site group is only working in one individual site.
  2. Cross site group name can be the same in different site groups, but contains totally different users. While using Active Directory group, the group name must be unique across all site collections.
  3. Cross site group is much easier to manage. It does not need the IT department to create every single group you need in Active Directory for your SharePoint sites. When your SharePoint sites grow more and more, these Active Directory groups management will be a big issue.

Comments

Red Mike said…
It’s a really good way. Another one for easy permissions management is to use special software. If I'm not wrong scriptlogic just released their security explorer for sharepoint. You may want to take a look at their site scriptlogic.com - I'm sure you'll find a lot of information about this product.
August 16, 2007 at 3:58 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manage IIS 7 remotely using PowerShell and AppCmd

We can use  Windows PowerShell remoting features  to manage IIS 7 websites remotely.  Currently, remoting is supported on Windows Vista with Service Pack 1 or later, Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, and Windows Server 2008 Release 2.  Start Windows PowerShell as an administrator by right-clicking the Windows PowerShell shortcut and selecting Run As Administrator .  Enable PowerShell Remoting with Enable-PSRemoting -Force Starting a Remote Session using:  Enter-PSSession -ComputerName <COMPUTER> -Credential <USER> Now the PowerShell connected to the remote server. Any commands issued with work against the remote server. We can use the Appcmd.exe command line tool to manage remote server just as what we do locally. For example, to add an application pool: c:\windows\system32\inetsrv\appcmd add apppool /name:"Contoso" /managedPipelineMode:Integrated /managedRuntimeVersion:"v4.0" /enable32BitAppOnWin64:true To change application p...
Post a Comment
Read more

Entity framework code first error: OriginalValues cannot be used for entities in the Added state

When I was using Entity framework code first, I encountered an error when I tried to create an entity into database. The entity is: [ Table (" EmployeeProfile ")]     public partial class EmployeeProfile     {         [ Key ]         [DatabaseGeneratedAttribute(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Identity)]         public int EmployeeProfileID { get; set; }         [ ForeignKey ("Employee")]         public int EmployeeID { get; set; }         public virtual Employee Employee { get; set; }         [ ForeignKey (" Profile ")]         public int ProfileID { get; set; }         public virtual Profile Profile { get; set; }       ...
Post a Comment
Read more

X509Certificate2: The system cannot find the file specified.

When I use the new X509Certificate2(fileName, password, X509KeyStorageFlags.DefaultKeySet) to create certificate from certificate file containing private key in my web application, I got following error message: System . Security . Cryptography . CryptographicException : The system cannot find the file specified . at System . Security . Cryptography . CryptographicException . ThrowCryptogaphicException ( Int32 hr ) at System . Security . Cryptography . X509Certificates . X509Utils . _LoadCertFromBlob ( Byte [] rawData , IntPtr password , UInt32 dwFlags , Boolean persistKeySet , SafeCertContextHandle & pCertCtx ) at System . Security . Cryptography . X509Certificates . X509Certificate . LoadCertificateFromBlob ( Byte [] rawData , Object password , X509KeyStorageFlags keyStorageFlags ) at System . Security . Cryptography . X509Certificates . X509Certificate2 .. ctor ( Byte [] rawData , String password , X509KeyStorageFlags keyStorageFlags ) In orde...
10 comments
Read more